GeorgeLoBuono
Registered user
Global user
Registered: 11-2008
Location: Davis, CA
Posts: 2
Karma: 0 (+0/-0)
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Important News: human science now aligns with aliens?
Here’s some important news. Dr. HongSheng Zhao at the University of St. Andrews Physics and Astronomy department asserts that dark matter and dark energy may be two faces of the same coin.
Unlike other scientists who think dark matter is separate from dark energy, sciencedaily.com (Feb 1, 08) reports that:
“In Dr. Zhao’s model, dark energy and dark matter are simply different manifestations of the same thing, which he has considered as a ‘dark fluid.’ On the scale of galaxies, this dark fluid behaves like matter and on the scale of the Universe overall as dark energy, driving the expansion of the Universe.”
Zhao says, “The search for dark-matter particles so far has concentrated on highly energetic particles. If dark matter, however, is a twin phenomenon of dark energy, it will not show up at instruments like the LKC, but has been seen over and over again in galaxies by astronomers. “
Here’s the clincher, like Bob Lazar’s and Dr. Michael Wolf’s explanation of alien physics, Zhao’s findings “are compatible with an interpretation of the dark component as a modification of the law of gravity rather than particles or energy.” Let’s say that again—it’s important: Zhao’s saying that dark energy AND dark matter imply that we simply need to modify our characterization of gravity to account for that essentially extra dimension in astrophysics.
Zhao’s findings resonate with physicists Laughlin and Chapline’s model of black holes as being, instead, “dark energy stars.” George Chapline of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, and Nobel laureate Robert Laughlin, suggest that black holes could, instead, be dark energy stars. Because objects falling into a black hole should stretch out so extremely that outside observers would note a freeze of time--which would cause the object to appear to linger at the event horizon forever (they don’t), physicists have searched for alternatives to the standard quantum model. Chapline and Laughlin note that when superconducting crystals go through “quantum critical phase transition,” electron spin doesn’t fluctuate wildly, as the standard model predicts it should. Instead, electron fluctuations slow down--as though time were literally slowed!
So, Chapline and Laughlin came up with a startling, new explanation. Working with colleagues, Chapline and Laughlin posit that when large stars end their fusion cycle, instead of forming a “black hole,” a phase transition (a sudden change of state) creates a thin “quantum critical shell,” the size of which depends on a star’s mass. A New Scientist article on the subject says the shell doesn’t contain a space-time singularity…. “Instead, the shell contains a vacuum, just like the energy-containing vacuum of free space…. The team’s calculations show that the vacuum inside the shell has a powerful anti-gravity effect, just like the dark energy that appears to be causing the expansion of the universe to accelerate…. ‘Quantum critical shells are a two-way street,’” says Chapline. He suggests that the energies involved match those of the expected dark energy of the entire universe.
In other words, being a two-way street, black holes may connect outwardly via dark energy, and the universe could be a large, tendentious dark energy object, or cycle. Chapline further suggests that the inside of a black hole may act like a superfluid, i.e. super cold Helium 4, a superfluid that climbs up container walls. It’s a useful model, and seems to agree with alien statements about negative energy and hyperspace (plus aspects of Bearden’s Δt).
Now, with Zhao’s new interpretation, human science is now ready to align with and match various aliens’ interpretations of physics. That, in itself, is an important threshold in human history.
|
|
11/9/2008, 1:09 am
|
Link to this post
Send Email to GeorgeLoBuono
Send PM to GeorgeLoBuono
|
